Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

Really? The Supreme Court released a predator into our political system that is oozing slime?

Wrong! Just like the black hagfish, Nancy Pelosi is one of the slimest creatures known to man  . . . . . and our political system!

In reaction to the U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision allowing unions and corporations to participate as independent voices in political campaigns, Nasty-Nancy Pelosi has lent her nastiness to a “People’s Rights Amendment,” introduced in Congress by Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) The Amendment would enable congress to parse who has First Amendment free speech rights, by restricting those rights to “natural persons” and states.

In other words, they intend to take away the voice of businesses and corporations. Why you ask? They want to remain in power; and they don’t like the notion that businesses are anonymously allowed to speak out against the agenda of the Democratic Party.

I think her mama must have dropped her on her head when she was a youngin’, only she could be that stupid! What should have happened is that she should have been put in a burlap bag and thrown off a bridge when she was just a pup!

That they are trying to undo what the Supreme Court has already ruled on is preposterous! Who the hell does she think she is anyway? Her factitiousness, and that of the people she supports, is staggering!

The left screamed and moaned and hollered when Obamacare was brought before the Supreme Court, because they thought that was just downright despicable and disrespectful.

Their thinking is that the citizens of the United States of America, the 47% of the people that did not vote for Obama — and the 60 plus percent who disagree with the constitutionality of obamacare — who the hell are they to tell the Democratic Party, and those who supported obamacare, what the hell they can or cannot do!

Well now the shoe is on the other foot . . . ‘cept that this is not just something that was constitutionally questionable . . . it is something that has been tried and trued, something that has been laid down in stone for over 200 years, and now that it doesn’t suit their purpose they want to undermine it any way they can!

It was all fine and dandy for that fat fucking moron, Michael Moore, to make Fahrenheit 9/11 about George W. Bush, and air it within thirty days of the primary election or 60 days of a general election. However when the nonprofit corporation Citizens United wanted to air a film critical of Hillary Clinton, Hillary: the Movie, the shit hit the fan.

Right away the left was screaming that the airing of such a film was violation of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act. Well the Supreme Court decided that the film wasn’t a violation; instead, it decided that the BCRA was a violation of free speech. The left was out to gag the electorate then, and they have sought out to do it once more.

This is no different than when Harry Reid flipped his wig because the Republicans wanted to do away with the “filibuster.” The right had a majority in congress and the left was continuously relying on the filibuster to block the republicans from accomplishing anything in congress, so naturally Reid thought that trying to abolish the filibuster was criminal. On the flip side, when the left held the majority in congress, Harry Reid was all about doing away with the filibuster, because the republicans were using it to block the actions of the left.

Once again, it only mattered that it was in the best interest of the Democratic Party and their agenda. They aren’t writing legislation to benefit the people; and they are most certainly not acting in our best interests. They are acting in their own interest; they are afraid what will happen to them when their cash flow gets shut off. Then they’ll have to get off their asses and go get a real job. The right is not exactly innocent when it comes to this kind of behavior either; after all, they wanted to abolish the filibuster in the first place to attain what was on their agenda.

People need to wake up and quit voting for these self serving egotists! We need to throw all these pricks out. Let them eat dirt! Another good example is H.R. 347/S.1794 . . .

The same pricks in Washington D.C. that instigated the violence through their divide and rule campaign strategies are in my opinion the same pricks that incited the shooting of Gabby Giffords.

Their solution . . . they enacted H.R. 347, so they, themselves, stood a better chance of not getting shot in the future. Nevermind, admitting their culpability; nevermind, calling for a ceasefire on the rhetoric. Fuck it! Let’s just strip the citizens of some more of their rights. Yeah! That’ll fix it! And that is exactly what they did, they took another chunk of our civil liberties away by restricting our right to protest in areas that they deem be appropriate. So now you need to be afraid to approach your representative for fear that you’ll get locked up for ten years.

You know it is bad when the folks from Obama’s Windy City start badmouthing the left . . . Chicago Sun Times reporter, Steve Huntley, recently posted the headline ~

Liberals take aim at free speech

Huntley goes on to say . . .

The Constitution is under attack from the very people who claim to be fierce advocates of civil rights — liberals. [—]

[—] Their goal is to restrict the very first amendment the Founders attached to the Constitution in the Bill of Rights — the one saying Congress “shall make no law” limiting freedom of press, speech and religion, and the rights of association and to petition government.

www.suntimes.com/news/huntley/12082897-452/liberals-take-aim-at-free-speech.html

 

Advertisements